![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
174.68.76.189
In Reply to: RE: I wonder how that new iMac 5k would hold up against a plasma? posted by violinist3 on October 21, 2014 at 16:42:12
You'd only stand a chance if you could get the display CALIBRATED.
My iMac display is calibrated using an inexpensive 'spyder'. I can get prints that look EXACTLY like my display. I also attach the printers profile (available from Dry Creek) and TELL 'EM I have attached the profile and just print what I give 'em. And on what printer!
IF the monitor function can be profiled and such profile stored in the computer, than head on.
Personally? I'd try to find a USED last generation Panny from the GT60 or VT60 series. The TOP Samsung may be good, too. But I don't hear that about the 'last man standing' in the form of LG.
Too much is never enough
Follow Ups:
I hunted around ( with photos in its memory) for a good source with lots of resolution but couldn't find any with more than 10 mega pixels. what I saw was very good but not particularly thrilling.
Plasma won't go past 1080 because the cell size gets too small. That's why Plasma is now history except for what will become an entry level display. In a couple years, not even THAT.
What you need to know is 'dot pitch' size for a computer monitor.
If I size / modify a photo for MONITOR use only, I do it differently than if I want to print it. All prints I do are at 300dpi. Monitor photos USED to be all sized to 72dpi.
So, and I should have been more clear, earlier, we are talking about 2 things.
1. Color space. How much of an SRGB or AdobeRGB color space can the monitor produce
and
2. Resolution. Dot pitch and refresh rate.
The #1 thing most home photographers can do for themselves is CALIBRATE THEIR MONITOR.
Too much is never enough
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: